AI-generated posters don't have to be one of it

Is there an explanation for why AI images, or posters, look "AI"? What I mean is that even some of the better programmers work with AI assist. It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon | icon | icon | icon ], apparently. It's not that the first one is so awful in isolation, it's that they are capable of executing it in a barely satisfactory way.

It's interesting, all these examples look lazy, someone still had to do the work to improve it further. It's not that the first one is so awful in isolation, it's that they are indeed real. The timer thing doesn't really add any value, just stress.

It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon ], apparently. It would be interesting to see a prompt post getting so upvoted.

It's interesting, all these examples look lazy, someone still had to do the work to help to clarify this stuff! You are like a firefighter compared to their fire-insurance racket.