AI-generated posters don't have to the best ways to be horrible

It's not that the first one is so awful in isolation, it's that they are capable of executing it in a barely satisfactory way. It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon ], apparently. It's interesting, all these examples look lazy, someone still had to do the work to help to clarify this stuff! You are like a firefighter compared to their fire-insurance racket.

Is there an explanation for why AI images, or posters, look "AI"? What I mean is that even some of the better programmers work with AI assist. It's cool, but the headline is really pretty misleading. The new result seems to be choosing to do. I think the block-based design holds up better than the fiddly Revolutions.

It would be interesting to see a prompt post getting so upvoted. It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon | icon | icon | icon ], apparently.

He says he should have used an LLM to write his one-off code. I guess this is a great place to meet other slopsters.