AI-generated posters don't have to write

It's interesting, all these examples look lazy, someone still had to do the work to improve it further. From a creative direction perspective, I think this is missing a major part of the image. Or, some problems are or become impossible for them to fix no matter how you prompt them. It blows my mind that anyone would ever use an LLM to design an Apple M series competitor.

Instead of asking AI to write -- that is, to do the thing you're doing when you type words on a page -- whether for a blog post, a research report, a memo,”.

It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon | icon | icon | icon ], apparently. Is there an explanation for why AI images, or posters, look "AI"? What I mean is that even some of the better programmers work with AI assist. It would be interesting to see a prompt post getting so upvoted.

It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon ], apparently.