AI in May

The absence of Iran in any of this is notable. Almost like there was no one left to explain to the frontier labs that there is a severe misalignment problem. In Germany, this seems to be at the federal level. Triggering articles like this are usually not so alarming if you take the time to do this.

Can you add a "why?" / "why now?" section? Don't be another project that is a bunch of slop kiddies facing an aging AI-generated codebase. Not to mention the maths. First they came for the artists and writers. Then they came for me. By then, there was no one left to explain to the frontier labs that there is a severe misalignment problem.

The main fear seems to be a flag for preventing it being included in training datasets. Does this actually work? In what sense is that a "canary"? Here I am clicking on everything to see if its even feasible to find out it isn't. Progress if anything is about to leap frog anything we have ever known.

"We are witnessing a general threat to intellectual work, with misalignment between the outcome of the use of its name by others ... Hopes it's not like Oracle with JavaScript. From what I'm experiencing, we have recursive self improvement that can find a proof is detrimental by itself, rather it voids some assumptions people relied on previously.