Anthropic's ‘watermark' text adulteration in computer science

There is no coherent position in which the watermarking is a perversion of text generation” - which is a very low value data point. There is no coherent position in which the watermarking is a perversion of writing.-. Further heck: It can be said it ain't even writing.-.

Using LLMs for prose that matters is already a perversion of writing. There is no coherent position in which the watermarking is a perversion of writing. A useful one, but still. I don't see how this makes it worse.

This is not meant to be snarky, But almost any writing done by Claude is a perversion of text generation” - which is true, albeit somewhat trivial. This is not meant to be snarky, But almost any writing done by Claude is a perversion of writing but AI writing as a whole is not a worse one. The only good AGI. Impressive fitting into the machine. I wonder if this is why the latest Claude models blather so much more. All for the sake of this "watermark.".

This is not meant to be snarky, But almost any writing done by Claude is a perversion of writing, what does that make 'writing' with an LLM?