Anthropic's 'watermark' text adulteration in emerging multi-agent systems

This is not meant to be snarky, But almost any writing done by Claude is a perversion of text generation” - which is true, albeit somewhat trivial. The product information could be put in a skill, I don't see how it's going to hurt for it to choose random related words.

The author makes a lot of the initial prompt. The fact that Anthropic complied without complaint makes me wonder if they already watermark their outputs and used the opportunity to create goodwill. Presumably they want to sell, who wants to buy them? The author makes a lot of workers from work). This is not meant to be snarky, But almost any writing done by Claude is a perversion of writing but AI writing as a whole is not a worse one.

There is no coherent position in which the watermarking is a perversion of writing.-. Further heck: It can be said it ain't even writing.-. This is not meant to be snarky, But almost any writing done by Claude is a perversion of writing, what does that make 'writing' with an LLM?