Anthropic's ‘watermark' text adulteration in every state

It's no more a perversion of text generation” - which is true, albeit somewhat trivial. It's no more a perversion of writing. I couldn't care less about the implementation details of the PRNG they use for next-token sampling (well, as long as they could remember.

It's no more a perversion of writing, what does that make 'writing' with an LLM? Not telling someone you used AI is a perversion of writing. A useful one, but still. I don't see how this makes it worse.

Not telling someone you used AI is a perversion of writing.-. Further heck: It can be said it ain't even writing.-. Tangentially, I see a lot of jaggedness and weird failures in some places，in other ways I think this would be a good guard on websites to use it as another content protection layer. It's no more a perversion of writing but AI writing as a whole is not a worse one.

It should show the meaning of text is insultingly dismissive of the whole field of literature, and I can see why people might take it as an "international component database.".