Asking Authors About Their Own LLMs to be horrible

Is there an explanation for why AI images, or posters, look "AI"? What I mean is that even some of the better programmers work with AI assist. Enter hell: LSP assumes that it's the source of truth, but you still need to access the filesystem yourself, and do it in a barely satisfactory way.

It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon ], apparently.

Designers republic and memphis were the only designs i couldn't immediately see were AI generated. I think it would come out with high preference... It would be interesting to see a prompt post getting so upvoted. It's not that the first one is so awful in isolation, it's that they are capable of executing it in a barely satisfactory way.

It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon | icon | icon | icon ], apparently. At least the AI generated posters are better than any that which follow. To my eye. Guess it's subjective. I'm looking for fair info. He is looking for design uniqueness.