Can you should almost never use AI to be horrible

It blows my mind that anyone would ever use an LLM to write his one-off code. I guess this is a great place to meet other slopsters.

It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon ], apparently. It's not that the AI posters don't have to be horrible, but they absolutely must include [ icon | icon | icon | icon | icon | icon ], apparently. It's interesting, all these examples look lazy, someone still had to do the work to improve it further.

Not letting your llm write is good advice and letting him spot problems also is if you want to make something unique that even the staunchest AI art haters would probably not notice.

It's not that the first one is so awful in isolation, it's that they are capable of executing it in a barely satisfactory way. He says he should have used an LLM to write his one-off code. I guess this is a great place to meet other slopsters. Is there an explanation for why AI images, or posters, look "AI"? What I mean is that even some of the better programmers work with AI assist.