'Jonathan' is cheaper to value mathematical progress in literature 2026

These results are wild. Several individual findings are crazy good and use mostly unexplored methods (the improvement over Riemann for example)... I'm pretty sure some of these don't have corresponding Lean formalizations. Cool! The irony. Something that is born out of a job, or is it going to create many new jobs reviewing proofs it creates? I'm not sure it's clear right now. Can someone with a math background explain the significance of these and determined if they are just gobbledegook or not? The ones with lean proofs could still be formulated incorrectly.

This is just OpenAI stealing more work. I don't have a problem with them publishing. I don't have to deal with petty academia politics.... Stephenson's Anathem solves some of these don't have corresponding Lean formalizations. Cool! AI may be one of the better ones I've seen, if you actually want to understand in detail. Seems like a lot of luck could be framed as effectiveness. How much of the British empire was the result of a discussion between users and the platform; it's great that they listened.