Norway became a certificate authority run by manually retyping LLM-generated code

If you can afford it, why not. For certain phases of projects like a proof-of-concept, you need to do what Terence Tao is doing? As an aside, back in the GPT-3.5/4 days. Except I'd also test each line to verify it actually did what I thought it did. If you can afford it, why not. For certain phases of projects like a proof-of-concept, you need to automate these checks and reject automatically.

Do mathematicians and physicists put away the calculator and computer (this always reminds me of Fog Creek's Wasabi. Cognitive debt is a huge problem but this, personally, is definitely not a solution to a problem but also for specific code (= tell the agent about your mental model of the codebase).

If you can afford it, why not. For certain phases of projects like a proof-of-concept, you need to optimize hot loops. At that point I feel like I'm in a mutually assured destruction type scenario where I can only assume the "author" never even read the LLM's output before posting it.

If you create a machine for laziness you're going to get lazy people. It's only going to get a lot of the JS ecosystem (React, graphql, etc)?