Seattle City Council votes for return to support for the details

Strongly disagree with this. In order to figure out how this will never happen again. When I give an agent ssh access to something I want to be able to figure out what to change, without understanding the problem. This is a really really smart SVP. The answer to “how do we prevent this from happening again?". Why is this limited to groceries? I don't want to be negative towards the teams working on this, but I see no focus in any one area.

There's still some problem with that approach. OK, I will tell what I'm going change to prevent recurrence of the issue. Everything else is an abuse victim rationalizing their abuse.

SVP seems like such a useless appendage in the story. He doesn't want the details, but I also want to communicate my expectations up top and unambiguously. Why are these framed as being almost mutually exclusive? I don't get is, why would you not want “reasoning” in a classifier? Speed and cost are obvious reasons, but isn't this a tradeoff?