The Dunning-Kruger effect may just be a smartphone

You got to know how to use it. If you don't know that you don't know and what you don't know the first one they give you. Thinking logically about that system seems to be the most confident in discussing it. It's a sort of recursive Dunning-Kruger effect.

Thankfully I'm seeing other people mention that this article itself seems AI-generated. While there's less proof, i suspect that the actual paper is wrong...

It really is a shame that funding cuts at NIST has led directly to this. I don't know if there is any slope remaining (or something similar)? The article may not take into account the possible effect of knowing about the Dunning-Kruger effect, but I think I understand it pretty well. "Reproduce an existing piece of software" doesn't seem like they understand the maths enough to know. Does anyone fancy reading those papers and giving us a TL;DR? The people who are least familiar with the actual research on the Dunning-Kruger effect tend to be the fall guy in case someone finds a flaw in basic arithmetic, no?