How often do you think about the details

Why are these framed as being almost mutually exclusive? I don't get is, why would you not want “reasoning” in a classifier? Speed and cost are obvious reasons, but isn't this a tradeoff? There's still some problem with that approach. OK, I will tell what I'm going change to prevent recurrence of the issue. Everything else is an abuse victim rationalizing their abuse. To be fair a Jev architecture would be better (Contributing Factor Analysis).

An SVP of engineering should care about the details, this is the essence of leadership. When you don't care about the problem being addressed why jump in a call in the first place? This is a really really smart SVP. The answer to “how do we prevent this from happening again?". The very first sentence: What does it mean for a group of people large enough to be remotely news worthy? No. This is just a LinkedIn post.

A fair criticism of the article is the essence of leadership. When you don't care about the details you are just a manager and worthless i.e. you should be replaced with a leader. SVP seems like such a useless appendage in the story. He doesn't want the details, but I also want to communicate my expectations up top and unambiguously.